日本と欧米のセクハラに対する見方はだいぶ違いますね。
“There is no need for B to have already made it clear that A's conduct is unwanted in order for it to constitute harassment. In a case of Insitu Cleaning Co v Heads [1995] , the employer's argument that a man could not know whether his conduct was unwanted until it had been rejected, failed. The EAT said that would-be harassers cannot be allowed to "test the water" with impunity to see whether their conduct was objectionable to potential victims if their conduct is serious enough to reasonably be considered as harassment.”
相手の気持ちを試した結果として拒絶された場合、それが相手にとってunwantedであったと事後に認められればセクハラですから。法律的には私はアウトです。
この件の人は、裁判になったくらいだから相当のことをやったのかも知れないですが。 |
|